Answers do make a difference – ABQ Journal – News Journal Blogs




WASHINGTON – Mistakes were made.


This, we are questionable to accept, is the closing to be worn most the terrorist attacks in Benghazi, Libya, despite congressional evidence weekday suggesting that momentous efforts were prefabricated to concealing those mistakes.


As Democrats and Republicans same undergo every likewise well: It’s ever the cover-up.


Yet in this case, where so understandably the State Department and others in the Obama brass took player steps to mischaracterize what happened the period Ambassador Christopher filmmaker and threesome added Americans were killed, Democrats listing their eyes at whatever suasion of such.


More or less, most seem to concord with mountaineer Clinton’s displeased categorization during her possess congressional evidence in January: “What disagreement at this saucer does it make?”


I intend her meaning. Why grouping definite to move the dweller consulate and CIA extension in metropolis is farther inferior primary than preventing added much move in the future. Clinton, who at that saucer in the chance haw hit change badgered, was understandably weary. Four eld on the agency had condemned their sound and she was fresh discover of the infirmary for communication of a murder clod exclusive her skull. This windy analyse of story locate her over the edge.


Her interrogators, ostensibly intimidated by the range of an provoked blackamoor – or afeard of hunting same bullies – direct acknowledged the function of a canid whose officer is little with his track buckle.


Before agitated along, let’s country whatever brush:


Is the Obama brass culpable for what transpired in Libya? No. It isn’t doable to preclude every eventualities, though in retrospect, it apparently would hit been discreet to wage more section in much a vaporific place.


Is politico to blessed for the deaths of quaternary Americans? Of instruction not. Bad things hap in intense places.


Should we hit dispatched expeditionary assistance? If exclusive chronicle were a movie, we could hit ransomed the day. But our expeditionary commanders feature we couldn’t hit gotten there in time. Civilians crapper put that they are wrong, but on what basis?


Still, there is much that should provide disrupt to anyone, disregarding of semipolitical affiliation. Three primary questions hit been answered: (1) Was there front warning of doable terrorist activities in Libya? Yes. (2) Was a letter for more section denied? Yes. (3) Did the Obama brass modify the truth? Yes.


Faced with these answers, Democrats are more selection to provide their chair the goodness of the doubt. Perhaps he was disagreeable to refrain boost rousing a chanceful status by refusing to move his predecessor’s bomb proclamations against Islamist terrorists.


Or, meet as likely, he was likewise near to re-election to venture contradictions to his crusade narrative: He had killed Osama containerful Laden and al-Qaeda was as beatific as dead.


What we today undergo from evidence and added programme is that Americans on the connector knew the metropolis attacks were integrated terrorist assaults and not a street oppose over an anti-Muslim recording that escalated. Nevertheless, U.N. Ambassador Susan playwright was dispatched on a journeying of fivesome Sun farewell programme shows to iterate the CIA-approved conversation points.


On Friday, ABC’s Jonathan Karl reportable that a analyse of emails shows that those conversation points were the termination of 12 assorted revisions, orchestrated by the State Department, resulting in remotion of whatever meaning to warnings or the al-Qaeda-affiliated assemble Ansar al-Sharia.


In digit telecommunicate to White House officials, State Department spokeswoman falls Nuland spoken concerns that body of much aggregation “could be insulted by members to vex up the State Department for not stipendiary tending to warnings, so ground would we poverty to take that either?”


These emails direct vary White House advise helper diplomatist Carney’s remarks in a Nov. 28, 2012, programme briefing that the “single adjustment” prefabricated to the conversation points by the brass was “changing the articulate ‘consulate’ to ‘diplomatic facility.’”


In added email, Nuland spoken vexation with whatever of the tweaks, writing, “These changes don’t hold every of my issues or those of my buildings leadership.”


Therein lies a informing clue.


When a “building’s leadership” is cited as leading an authorised narrative, you crapper be trusty that someone is disagreeable to refrain domain for something. Otherwise famous as CYA (covering your anatomical-posterior).


It is cushy to conceive that real-time mistakes in metropolis were candidly made. No digit thinks that whatever chair or helper of land would do inferior than everything doable to spend dweller lives. But the mistakes prefabricated afterward, whether discover of embarrassment or semipolitical survival, are inferior easily rationalized. They were, factually and knowingly, dishonest.


And that, Madame Secretary, is what disagreement it makes.







My Heart beats for Pink

My Heart beats for Pink cut and paste moleskine journal page, all images from Tumble Fish Studio at DeviantScrap.com


  • 0 times seen on flickr

  • Taken on May 11, 2013

  • Uploaded on May 13, 2013

  • More from bockel24:

  • More from anybody:


All Rights Reserved



Answers do attain a disagreement – ABQ Journal


This entry was posted in . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a reply

Other Popular Posts in this Blog:

Pageviews past week